Adventure

The OSCARS and Other Notes

It is that time of season again and although this year wasn't an especially great year for films, a couple of interesting and outstanding "out of the box films" caught my eye: "The Artist", The Tree of Life" and "Melancholia".

On the other side of the coin, I'm grateful that the Harry Potter series has ended as they became painful to watch. And the Sherlock Holmes film was also very bad.

Some performances I would have like to have been honored but weren't would include: Michael Fassbender in "Shame", Kirsten Dunst in "Melancholia", Charlize Theron in "Young Adult", Carey Mulligan  in "Shame" (cannot give enough credit for her singing "New York, New York" as though she was standing on the edge of a cliff ready to fall at any moment), Christoph Waltz in "Carnage", and Albert Brooks in "Drive". 

Given the selected honorees by the academy, here are my picks for some of the categories:

  • Best Picture: "The Artist"

  • Actor in a Leading Role: Jean Dujardin in "The Artist"

  • Actor in a Supporting Role: Christopher Plummer in "The Beginners"

  • Actress in a Leading Role: Michelle Williams in "My Week with Marilyn"

  • Actress in a Supporting Role: Octavia Spencer in "The Help"

  • Cinematography: "The Tree of Life" Emmanuel Lubezki

  • Directing: Michel Hazanavicius for "The Artist"

  • Film Editing: "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" Kirk Baxter and Angus Wall

  • Adapted Screenplay: "The Descendants" Alexander Payne, Nat Faxon and Jim Rash

  • Original Screenplay: "Margin Call" J.C. Chandor

To all of you: Thank you for coming to my site and reading my reviews. The number of views has grown tremendously over this past year. There are now over 550 reviewed films and it is fun for me to post and read your comments.

May this new year bring on better films with new ideas tested and old ones enhanced. I know I'll be there in the 5th or 6th row center ready to suspend belief into someone else's story.

May you

Be Well...

Michael

The Grey

First Hit: This film’s scenery was to die for, but the film died a long slow death. 

The scene is a far northern section of Alaska where Anchorage is way south. It is cold and the land beautiful. An oil refinery is where all the workers toil and in a bar is where they play hard at night.

As the opening monologue states, most of the people working here are parolees or are guys who are very hardened by the life they’ve led. Ottway (played by Liam Neeson) is a protector. He protects outside workers from beasts who might see the workers as food. It is mostly wolves he has to shoot.

Ottway has many dreams of his wife who has passed away. He’s lonely and likes to be left alone in his sadness. A group of workers are headed back to Anchorage for an R&R. The scene of them loading the plane shows how intense the storm is. They are deicing the plane until it takes off. There a large bumps as they fly and most everyone is on edge.

The plane crashes and only 7 survive. There is a good scene as Ottway escorts one of the dying to their death. The 7 survivors are tough in their own way and Ottway immediately takes charge. Of course he is challenged.

Wolves surround and start to track the survivors and begin to pick them off one by one. Only Ottway has some intelligent information about how the wolves act. He notes that alpha wolf is in charge.

This is a story about survival, religious beliefs, men, and alpha men.

The animatronic wolves were mediocre at best and the alpha was black in color (so why was it called Grey).

The mixing of religious and non-religious beliefs didn’t work well and the scene where Ottway is speaking to God asking for some direct sign is a copy of Paul Newman in Cool Hand Luke where Luke stands in the church yelling at God for a sign – he got it and so does Ottway.

 Neeson is always a strong character regardless of the lines his character has to say. Here he says them with authority and strength, his character is believable. The rest of the cast was good but nothing outstanding. The problem with this film was the laborious script and the direction. The film needed about 20 – 30 minutes cut out of it to make it work. Joe Carnahan and Ian Mackenzie Jeffers wrote this overly cooked script while Carnahan, as director, didn’t reign in the scope. The cinematography of the area fully captured the cold intensity of the foreboding area of the country.

 Overall: If you’ve got two hours to kill on a Sunday evening watch the DVD version.

Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol

First Hit: Whatever one might say about Tom Cruise or this franchise of films, this film was entertaining.

Improbable would be a word that would fit but so would entertaining.

Despite all the odd dialogue and character development, this film is entertaining. OK, enough already about how entertaining it was.

This highly improbable story comes together because the actors make it work. Ethan Hunt (Cruise) is one of the government’s leading IMS agents. He commands the storyline and the sequences as a lead agent needs to.

William Brandt (Jeremy Renner) is the “Analyst” who has a story to tell. Benji Dunn (played by Simon Pegg) is the techno-nerd of the group. The last member of this team is Jane Carter (played by Paula Patton) is the other hands-on physically skilled team member.

The story is simple, someone wants to start a nuclear war between the Russians and Americans. The protagonist Kurt Hendricks (Michael Nyqvist) is a brilliant but slightly insane man who wants to be seen and counted on the world stage. Therefore he obtains the launch codes to Russian missiles and proceeds to make it the launching of a missile a retaliatory event.

This film is filled with great chase scenes and my favorite was the multi-story parking garage. This story also features the tallest building in the world and some of the shots brought up my, once thought gone, fear of heights feelings.

Cruise, despite what one thinks of him, has the ability to charm with good looks and be part of a chase scene and make it work well. Renner gives a strong performance as the Analyst with a story to hide. He's great in this role and provides added intelligence. Pegg is perfect as the odd-ball side kick with blather and brains. Patton is very good as a skilled fighter and her looks, as her character is required to be, fit the part well. Nyqvist is good as the steely man who wants to be seen. I liked Lea Seydoux as Sabine the assassin. Josh Appelbaum and Andre Nemec did a great job of coming up with a story line that works and is entertaining. Brad Bird did an excellent job of keeping the film, light, active, engaging, and without waste.

Overall: I enjoyed this 4th film in this franchise and would watch a fifth.

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows

First Hit:  This was one of the worst scripted and directed films ever and a true waste of time.

If I ever chose to sit through another film directed by Guy Ritchie, I would hope someone comes into the theater and shoots me.

I would prefer the pain of this than to sit through another mindless attempt by a man who has no understanding of filmmaking. He has good actors, whom I’m sure got paid well, puts them in front of a camera, and through a bunch of special effects try to  makes something that people will sit and oooo and ahhh to.

Please will someone give Richie an apprenticeship to a filmmakers school?

Robert Downey Jr. as Sherlock Holmes, knows better than to do films like this with a director like this. He's too smart, at least I thought he was. Jude Law, as Dr. Watson, will, with experience, know better than to do films like this where he has no character development or meaningful part. Michelle Mulroney and Kieran Mulroney, wrote a crappy, mindless script. Guy Ritchie might do well doing music videos which tell no story. In the film business the objective is to tell a story. His attempt here and in the previous one Sherlock film, which I also panned, at directing reeks of an amateur child playing with grown up tools and only liking the switches and dials to play with.

Overall: How does he get money to make these things?

Hugo (3D)

First Hit: Although interesting from a historical perspective and good acting made it entertaining, it isn't a great film.

This film is a tribute and gives homage to George Melies a pioneer filmmaker who directed 531 films between 1896 and 1914.

He was extremely creative and made “magic” appear on film. He pioneered special effects, multiple exposures, and other editing effects.

Unfortunately WWI created a vacuum of people interested in seeing his films and then the French government took all his celluloid films and melted them down into shoe heels. He ended up being a toy vendor in Montparnasse Train Station.

To create this homage film Director Martin Scorsese creates the character of a recently orphaned boy named Hugo (played by Asa Butterfield) who lives “in the walls” of the Montparnasse Train Station in Paris. Hugo takes care of the station clocks and survives by stealing food from unsuspecting (or maybe willing) station food vendors. The boy, the son of a watchmaker, likes fixing things and he is working on an animatronic human his father found all rusty in an old museum. Hugo hopes that if he fixes this figure that a message will come to him from his deceased father.

To fix this figure, Hugo is always looking for parts and occasionally steals toys from a vendor in the station (Melies). Caught by Melies (played by Ben Kingsley) while trying to steal a small mechanical mouse (for parts); he takes the boy’s notebook which details his father’s drawings about gears and things.

A series of events creates trouble for the boy in the station which is lorded over by a Station Inspector (played by Sasha Cohen). Isabelle (played by Chloe Grace Moretz) who is being looked after by her uncle (Melies) and Aunt “mama” Jeanne (played by Helen McCrory), befriends Hugo and together they figure out that the Melies was the creator of the animatronic human figure Hugo is working on.

The film shifts direction here and focuses on the history of Melies. Here in lies one of three problems for me with this film. First, the shift of the film from Hugo to Melies was not very subtle but it worked and I accepted it.

Second, Scorsese’s use of 3D (the film can also be viewed in 2D) was sometimes excessive (the close up of the Station Agent's Doberman Pinscher is an example) and felt as though the shot with a 3D effect was more important than the content of the shot.

And third, all the main characters where speaking proper English while the scene is Paris, this seemed odd. However, aside of these issues, the cinematography, at times, was extraordinary.

The characters were interesting, especially Mama Jeanne and Melies and I really liked the inter-play between the main characters.

Lastly, knowing little about Melies before the film, this film has driven me to learn more about a man who created magic in a genre I love.

Butterfield is excellent as the driven orphan who is focused on living life on his terms and becomes friends with Melies. Kingsley does an excellent job of being a sad curmudgeon only to have his heart and spirit lifted by the young boy’s efforts. Cohen is funny and effective as the mean Station Inspector whose own physical limitations keep him small minded. Moretz is grand as the little girl who bridges the gap between Hugo and Melies. McCrory is effortless and charming in her role as Melies wife and former lead actress in his films. John Logan wrote effective dialogue. Scorsese did a good job of directing this film although it seemed to be two different films; one about the kid and the other about a tribute to Melies. His use of 3-D was over worked at some point. It almost seemed as though he was using it to excess to honor Melies. I was and am still struck that such a mood piece, taking place in Paris, would be in all proper English - not a French line in it. It just seemed out of sorts (or maybe done so that there is a US audience and a way to make money).

Overall: I really enjoyed learning about Melies and this was an effective way of doing it.

googleaa391b326d7dfe4f.html