Comedy

The Invention of Lying

First Hit: This was a witty film which provoked thought but also seemed to either miss its target or go over some of the audience’s head.

What would happen if you lived in a world where everyone told the truth? In fact, no one was capable of lying. Everything you say is believed because no one can tell a lie.

The premise of this film is that the world would be much as it is today, only the interaction between people would be different. We’d really say what we thought and not worry about how another might really feel about our thoughts.

Example: Upon meeting a woman she might say to me, “you’re nice and you seem friendly, but I’m not attracted to you because you are balding and don’t dress well.” How would I feel if that is how someone greeted me? I’m not really sure, however it does pose an interesting question.

In this film, people’s reactions to these statements are relatively minor and because they’ve been brought up this way, they aren’t devastated, they are used to it. What would happen, then, if you were able to lie? How would you be seen? Would anyone else know? Would they understand what a lie is? What would you do?

This is what happens to Mark Bellison (played by Ricky Gervais). One day he learns how to lie. Pondering his new ability and given that he doesn’t have enough money in the bank to pay his rent he tries a logical solution to his problem.

With his new found skill he tells the bank teller he needs $800 although he only has $300 in his account. The bank teller says she is sorry that the computer is incorrect and gives him the $800 dollars and promises to get his account data fixed. It never crosses anyone’s mind that he isn’t telling the truth because no one can lie except Mark.

Although getting money is fine, his primary focus is Anna (played by Jennifer Garner). He has one date with her before he learned how to lie and he is clearly attracted to her. But he knows she is out of his league and she tells him so.

But with his new power to he hopes that his newly gained wealth and style will let her see beyond the physical problems she sees with him; meaning he doesn’t have the gene pool she is looking for. Because Mark’s mother is dying he decides to tell her a lie about dying. He tells her she won’t slip into nothingness, as everyone believes. He tells her she’ll go to a place where everyone gets a mansion and all of her friends and family will be around to love her.

A nurse overhears this story and spreads the word that Mark knows more than he is telling and that he needs to tell everyone in the world what happens after they die. Mark resists at first but with pubic pressure and pressure from Anna, he writes down 10 things. 

These 10 things cover the criteria required to die and be rewarded with mansions with your family and friends around you. This criteria has been set up by "the man in the sky” who’s not quite in outer space but beyond the clouds so you can't see him. That these 10 things are written on pizza boxes is priceless.

This is an interesting and very innovative script. Ricky Gervais directs, wrote and starred in this film, and in all cases he was good; although I felt the film lagged at times due to direction. The inventive script was surprisingly good and, upon reflection, I wondered if people telling the truth (incapable of lying versus just being truthful) would tell the truth in such a crass and unfeeling way. I found the dialog at times extremely funny with analogies and juxtapositions which were very clever and made me laugh out loud. However, I was often the only one laughing in this fairly crowded opening night movie theater. Although I don’t mind being the only one laughing, it made me wonder if I was reading something into this film that wasn’t there. Although at the end of the film some people in the audience applauded. This film plays with, and looks at, the ideas around telling the truth, shallowness of thought, lying, heaven, the basic story of Christianity, people wanting to know what is next after life, and how important it is to look beyond the outside of people. It asks questions like: If everyone told the truth would they be shallow in their interpretation of others? Would people be relegated to being a loser their whole life, because of their outward looks and they were told by everyone else? Any many many more.

Overall: This was a very inventive idea to bring to film. I left the theater thinking about the questions it poses and know that some of these questions will reappear long after the film has left the theater.

The Informant!

First Hit:  A boring and somewhat tedious film with very little to care about and not very funny.

I have no idea what Steven Soderbergh was attempting to do with this film. Although the film takes place in the early to mid 1990’s the music has the feel of the 1950’s which, I suppose, was to give it a comedic flare.

Matt Damon plays Mark Whitacre an executive biochemist with ADM Corporation. Mark is feeling pressure because his new product isn’t developing well in the laboratory; it keeps getting infected with a virus. Because of this pressure, he's concerned he'll be fired so me makes up a story that the Japanese are tampering with his work and that's why the virus keeps appearing.

His bosses want to get the FBI involved, which will blow the lid off his fictitious story so he tells the FBI that his bosses at ADM are involved in a price fixing scheme. Meanwhile, we see Mark taking payments from other men in other countries and we don't really know who they are or why they are paying him. As the price fixing story gets traction, Mark becomes friends with the two FBI agents who work directly with him.

To show his commitment to them and the price fixing story, he dons a wire and tapes price fixing meetings that take place over a 3 year period. When the FBI raid ADM, the ADM executives discover that Mark has been taking payouts from other people.

When the government realizes that their key witness has been taking payouts, they believe their case is ruined. Sitting in the audience while this story unfolded, I wondered where the humor was in all this. 

My perception is that the humor was suppose to be in the delivery of the character by Damon. I’m not sure why Soderbergh thought making a comedy was the way to go, because it was neither funny or serious, it was boring.

Damon’s mental monologues which were narrated for us at odd moments in the story were quirky but for the most part they weren't funny. Then there was the over publicized snippet "I'm 0014 because I'm twice as smart as 007".

The funniest part of the whole film to me was that he actually thought that ADM's board of directors would make him President of the company when they discovered that the other executives were crooks.

Soderbergh’s direction of this film fails miserably. Damon is quirky and does a great job of being quirky, but so what. I didn’t care one hoot about his character or any other character on the screen. I'd like to care for something in the film even if it is for a dark criminal; but there is nothing to care about and I left the theater wishing I’d seen something else.

Overall: Despite all the promotion about this film, there is little that makes the story engaging or interesting. The music tried to make the film seem nostalgic, however it was nauseating. This could have been an interesting story just not the way it was told here.

My One and Only

First Hit: This is a pleasantly nice film with a relatively interesting story about someone who is relatively well known but that most people know little about; George Hamilton.

Logan Lerman plays a young George Hamilton in his high school years recalling an important time when his mother Anne Deveraux (played by Renee Zellweger) decided to leave his philandering father Dan Deveraux (played by Kevin Bacon) an orchestra leader of the 40’s and 50’s.

The film begins when Anne returns from a brief trip to find Dan having another affair. She has had it, gathers the boys, buys a Cadillac Eldorado and heads to Boston looking for another husband to pay her way and give her the life she is looking for.

Anne is quite charming and has a way with her charm but her quest connects her with men who are not quite up to snuff. Her oldest son Robbie (played by Mark Rendall), who is gay, and George follow along with their mom hoping she finds what she is looking for and they finally get a home. With each failed attempt at meeting a new “step dad” they become poorer and their circumstances more desperate.

Out of money and hope, they land at her sister’s house where there is no love lost but there is stability for the boys. A couple of miss adventures and they end up with enough money to head to California, where both George and Robbie find their calling.

Zellweger is outstanding as a confused, headstrong, loving mother who does her best to do what is right. Her charm in this film is her perky and optimistic outlook regardless of the pickle they find themselves in ('never look in the rear view mirror, that’s what's behind us, always look forward and into the future'). Lerman is strong in his role as a very young man thrust into the role of head of household and responsible enough to drive (although not legally old enough) the three of them to each new city and adventure. Bacon’s plays a minor but significant character and is a driving force in the film. He is good in this role and plays the philandering father as; this is what band leaders do sort of way. Bacon’s voice is quick witted, gravely and husky and it worked. Richard Loncraine directed this film in a way that let the characters play out who they were and created something that was fun, interesting and well acted.

Overall: This isn’t one of the best films of the year, but there is some outstanding acting which made this film well worth watching.

All About Steve

First Hit: This is absolutely the worst Sandra Bullock film yet. It was a waste of celluloid and of my time.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Sandra Bullock but in this film, she fails to create a likable, interesting character let alone one worth caring about.

The film begins by wanting us to believe that Mary Horowitz (Bullock) is smarter than most people because of her ability to create crossword puzzles and that she wants to create a daily puzzle instead of her weekly one. The discussions about her crossword prowess with her boss and anyone who will listen to her is suppose to build her credibility.

However, what it does do is alienate both the people she’s talking to and much of the audience. Her parents set her up with Steve (played by Bradley Cooper) a news cameraman who is supposed to be a knockout, at least in her eyes. As soon as they get to his truck to leave for their date, she attacks him and pushes to have sex.

Steve is initially excited but then sees that she’s a little too talkative, odd and aggressive and tells her he has to leave. I don't know if this is suppose to be funny or sad; a man turning down sex with a beautiful woman or because this all happens outside of Mary's parents house just moments after they got into the truck.

Because he wants to let her down gently he alters the truth and says if she didn't have a job she could travel with him. Steve's reality is that as she gets out, he hopes to never see her again. However, Mary becomes obsessed with Steve, writes a crossword where every clue and answer is about Steve, and because she does this she gets fired. This is the film's setup.

The rest of the film is about her chasing Steve down at his various news sites and causing trouble for Steve or others. Thomas Haden Church plays Hartman, the on-screen commentator which Steve films at each of their news events. He has a childish mean streak in him so he continues to encourage Mary to follow them from news scene to news scene by telling Mary that Steve really loves her.

Bullock is bad in this film. Her accent, non-stop rambling and quirkiness created a character which couldn’t be cared about let alone believable. Haden Church was funny at times as was Ken Jeong as Angus, their on-site director. Cooper was lost and added little to the film and gave no reason, other than his looks, as to why anyone would be obsessed with him.

Overall: This was a waste of time and I’m not sure how and why the actors signed up for this extended strip of celluloid. Please don’t bother going to see this.

Taking Woodstock

First Hit: It was an enjoyable and at times interesting, story but it left me wanting to go see the film Woodstock for the 4th time.

Based on a true story; Demetri Martin plays Elliot Tiber who, as the story would have it, saved the Woodstock Concert.

The film is about what happened to Elliot, his mother and father Sonia and Jake Teichberg (played by Imelda Staunton and Henry Goldman respectively) who were running a rundown resort in upper New York which was going into bank default when Elliot comes up with an idea to save the motel and the Woodstock festival. He had read that the concert was kicked out of one venue and was searching for a new one to hold its arts and music festival.

When Michael Lang (played by Jonathan Groff) flies to the motel in a helicopter while the other Woodstock Ventures personnel arrive in limos the cash begins to flow. Initially, the Woodstock Ventures group said Elliot’s open field land was unserviceable, however when Elliot introduces them to Max Yaugar (played by Eugene Levy) and they see his land, a deal is made.

The town’s people resent Max’s deal and Elliot for using the permit to let hundreds of thousands of hippies invade their town for the concert so they ostracize and picket them. However, they also take advantage of the invasion of young people and make money from the concert as well. As the concert date gets closer the activity around Elliot’s family motel increases which include his parents getting high on hash brownies, the hiring of an ex-Marine drag queen named Vilma (played by Liev Schreiber) for security, and Elliot’s coming out as a gay man.

None of the music of Woodstock is heard, and that does take away from the film as does a senseless and poorly acted Vietnam Veteran role played by Emile Hirsch.

Although I would have liked to have heard some of the music and seen some of the Woodstock acts, having a little insight to this critical background story was enjoyable and, at times, well acted.

Martin, is very good as Elliot. Goldman was effective as his quiet and resigned father. Staunton was outstanding as his scared, shrewd mother. Kudo’s to Schreiber as Vilma as he was clearly outstanding in the role as a drag queen and former Marine. As mentioned Hirsch was unbelievable as a Vietnam Vet (being one myself), and Levy was great as Yaugar. Ang Lee caught the flavor of Woodstock and some of the people who came to enjoy the music. Occasional scenes showing original news footage was effective and I loved seeing the VW vans, cars, and the carefree feeling of that period effectively represented.

Overall: It was a good film and I was a bit let down by the lack of the original Woodstock music, I found myself waiting to hear it.

googleaa391b326d7dfe4f.html