The Man Who Knew Infinity

First Hit:  An interesting film about a fascinating individual whom I knew nothing about.

I knew nothing about and had never heard about Srinivasa Ramanujan (Dev Patel) a young Indian man who, without any formal mathematical education, spewed out amazing mathematical theorems.

For him they were intuitive. natural and were derived directly from God. Being Hindu, vegetarian, and supremely focused on the formulas that came to him through long sessions that were combined with praying, he was an anomaly in the world of mathematics.

Being buried in the poorest sections of Madras, unable to get a job so that he could have a home with this wife Janaki (Devika Bhise), and no one believing what he was creating as valid, he thought his work would die with him. On this third letter to scholar mathematicians in England, G. H. Hardy (Jeremy Irons), a Fellow at Trinity College in Cambridge, saw potential greatness and sponsored Ramanujan to visit him in England.

Upon his arrival Hardy and Fellow mathematician Littlewood (Toby Jones) began to work with Ramanujan to learn how to prove and publish his theorems. As this was during the time of WWI, Cambridge was bombed and Ramanujan became ill with tuberculosis.

The film takes the audience through, his battle to prove his work, his loneliness of missing his wife, and finding a way to be seen as an equal to his mathematical peers.

Patel is excellent as Ramanujan. I believed his character and got an idea of the struggle Ramanujan must have had. Additionally, he looks a lot like the real person. Irons was strong as the socially awkward, atheist mathematician who believed in Ramanujan but also wanted this new mathematician to have the same scientific rigor that all mathematicians are held to. Bhise had a small role but her love, angst and loyalty to her husband was sincerely palpable. Jones was great as Hardy’s friend and mathematician side-kick. Matt Brown both wrote and directed this film and it was obvious that he cared about sharing this story.

Overall:  It was more of a learning lesson to me about this amazing mathematician whose work is still being used and explored.

Money Monster

First Hit:  This film does not disappoint as it pointedly and powerfully touches on the themes of the day:  The struggle of the middle class, media’s (and social media) power to influence, the police’s response to a situation, and the rich manipulating the system for self-benefit.

Lee Gates (George Clooney) is an over amplified version of Jim Cramer’s afternoon program called “Mad Money” on CNBC.

In Gates’ daily program called “Money Monster” he uses sometimes crude, always flamboyant, and other over the top ways to share what he thinks is going on in the stock market. He’s got a huge following. His director is Patty Fenn (Julia Roberts).

The live show’s success is the combination of his unpredictability, verbal acuity, smarts, and unbridled flair as directed and in concert with her ability to know where he’s going with any particular point allowing the screen graphics to match Gate’s thoughts thereby maximizing the impact for the viewers.

Does Gates go overboard? Yes, and based on statements he made on an earlier show’s prediction for IBIS (an automated trading company), Kyle Budwell (Jack O’Connell) loses all his money. In fact, just about everyone who invested in IBIS loses their money.

Kyle is beyond angry, he wants answers and makes his way onto the set of Gates’ live show with a gun and a vest bomb which he forces Gates to wear.

This film is about: How Kyle comes to this breaking point. How Gates responds to this life threatening intrusion. How some people manipulate money for their own greedy purpose. How the public responds to this live, on air, real-time drama. How the police respond to Budwell’s dilemma. And about Kyle’s pregnant girlfriend Molly (Emily Meade); how does she respond to this event?

I won’t tell you how the film deals with all these questions except to comment on one: How the police respond. Waking up this morning after seeing the film last night, I’m still saddened by the reflective shoot first mentality of the police. We are bombarded these days with the police shooting people as a solution to many situations. There seems to be little room in their mantra to learn more about the situation and the people involved before shooting them.

In this film, from the get go, they (particularly one cop) had one focus which was to kill (“take him out”) Kyle. It isn’t that I didn’t understand their position, guy with gun sometimes aiming it at law enforcement officers, but their actions were heavy handed and reflected the large number of police shootings that cross our headlines every day.

Clooney is perfect as the narcissistic TV personality that masks a lonely life. His portrayal of Gates is wonderful because his caring true self wins in the end. Roberts was beyond fantastic. I thought she caught all the nuances of a TV director and someone who was willing to risk her life to do the right thing for all. O’Connell was amazingly strong as the semi-unhinged guy who just wanted to not be ripped off any longer. His life as a $14.00 an hour guy, who had just lost his mother, his strong willed girlfriend being pregnant, and his concern for how his baby would survive in this world was palpable in all his actions. His moments of confusion, reflection, humiliation, and clear path to wanting to get answers were spot on. Caitriona Balfe as Diane Lester the girlfriend of IBIS CEO and Chief Publicity Officer for IBIS was very good as her subtle shift of consciousness from stonewalling the public to leading the charge and find out what happened was well portrayed. Dominic West as IBIS CEO Walt Camby was well done. His manipulative version of, I’m lying through my teeth about our company being transparent, ran true. Meade as the fed-up girlfriend was powerful as her character pulled no punches. Lastly, Lenny Venito as Lenny the cameraman was perfect. Jamie Linden and Alan DiFiore wrote a wonderfully taut and biting screenplay that covered a lot of bases. Jodie Foster did an excellent job of directing this film. There were some outstanding moments and cuts that were really strong and moved this film along at the perfect clip while covering a lot of ground.

Overall:  This real-time film was perfectly acted, had a strong script and was elegantly directed by Jodie Foster - kudos.

The Meddler

First Hit:  The film had funny bits and it was Susan Sarandon’s performance that held it together.

When the film opens, Marnie (Sarandon) has been a widow for over a year. Her husband left her with enough money that she doesn’t have to worry about any financial matters and she's not dealt with her husbands ashes yet. She's moved out to Los Angeles to be near her daughter Lori (Rose Byrne) who has just broken up with her boyfriend Jacob (Jason Ritter).

Lori is devastated by the breakup and therein-lies one of the downfalls of this film, we really don’t know why. And even in the short scenes those two have together, there are no clues.

Because we know nothing of their relationship, we  are expected to believe that the depressed malaise Lori carries around is valid. Unfortunately, I didn’t buy it. This could be the issue of the screenplay, director, or actor.

With her daughter being depressed, Marnie is ready, willing and able to meddle in her daughter's life. She calls Lori at least 15 times a day and leaves long meandering messages, tries to tell her daughter what to do with her life, and shows up at her house unannounced. She smothers her daughter and appears clueless that she is acting this way.

When Lori heads to New York for work, Marnie suggests going with her. Lori says no, so Marnie starts to meddle in Lori’s friends lives. The difference is that they like it, although some of the attraction is that she has money and seems willing to spend it on them, including a wedding for a lesbian couple.

She also transports her Apple Genius Bar helper Freddy/Fredo (Jerrod Carmichael) to his school classes. All the things she does are for other people, and it's clear she’s not facing her own deep sorrow. She happens to meet Zipper (J.K. Simmons) who is a retired police officer and his accepting kind nature helps her begin to see a next step, which means moving along with her life.

Sarandon is very strong and effective as the meddling Marnie. Sarandon gives Marnie a strength of character and disarming charm that works well in this film. Byrne is OK, however I never bought her devastation from breaking up with Jacob. It seemed more like she was acting as a character versus playing and embodying the situational circumstance of the character. Carmichael was very good as the Apple Genius Bar guy who wants to improve his life. Simmons seemed to channel his best Sam Elliot with the mustache, deep voice and calm demeanor. Not that it was bad, but it just seemed like Elliot could have been substituted with little difference. Lorene Scafaria wrote and directed this film and it would seem she has had some experience with a “meddler” in her own life.

Overall:  Despite some of the film's faults, it was entertaining and at times very funny.

Captain America: Civil War

First Hit:  I was shocked that people applauded at the end of this film because the story was too fabricated and forced to make it interesting.

I like a good superhero film every once in a while. However, because they make money for the studios, storylines are created to put more of the heroes together.

It isn’t enough to have a group of Avengers focus on a single enemy, here the script writers and producers decided to have them pitted against one another. This, of course, will boost viewership, however I do not think it helps the brand in the long run. This action mirrors short term profits are more important than long term gain and integrity.

The best acting done in this film is by Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark and Iron Man. The rest of the superheroes have their moments and it is obvious that the film is set up this way. Each of them gets to display their “super powers”.

The one exception to all of this is the introduction of Spiderman/Peter Parker (Tom Holland). His character is funny due to his newness to his spidey powers and his youthful attitude. The film does try to explore the importance of friendship through the relationship and actions of Captain America/Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) and the Winter Soldier/Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan). Their lifelong friendship is tested here.

Also friendship is overtly tested between Iron Man and Captain America. Then there is the issue of government control of The Avengers and their response to issues in the world. This is brought up  because innocent people have been killed through their heroic involvement. Both of these subjects are feebly addressed by the story.

Downey Jr. was the best of the group of actors mostly because he had a fair amount of introspective and intelligent dialogue. Evans is only OK, but I cannot tell if it is only because of the role, script, or Evans own acting abilities. Holland is fun and is the most amusing character. Stan is good as the stoic semi-enemy of The Avengers and the general public. Daniel Bruhl (as the real enemy Zemo) is good enough to pull off being the real antagonist. Scarlett Johansson, Anthony Mackie, Don Cheadle, Jeremy Renner, Chadwick Boseman, Paul Bettany, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, and Frank Grillo are only OK as the superheroes that are pitted against each other because their roles are minimized. Christopher Marcus and Stephen McFeely wrote this, let’s make money, script that doesn’t fully address the friendship and government control questions and minimizes the skills of this extensive cast. Anthony and Joe Russo’s co-direction is evident because of the scattered way this film interprets the screenplay and use of this fine cast.

Overall:  This was a film I didn’t need to see.

Papa Hemingway in Cuba

First Hit:  A mediocre attempt to share the final days of Hemingway in Cuba while watching his creative demise through alcohol.

I liked the idea and concept of this film but segments, especially with Joely Richardson (as Mary Hemingway), felt as though either the screenplay or the acting was forced and poorly executed.

The idea that Ernest Hemingway (Adrian Sparks) responded to a letter that reporter Ed Myers (Giovanni Ribisi) wrote him resulting in an invitation to Cuba to meet Hemingway was creative. However, there didn’t seem to be enough energy between the two despite the screenplay that wanted Myers feel as though Papa was going to take the role of his own family.

There were scenes that were very engaging between the two, like when Hemingway accused Myers was ratting on him to a mafia guy. Conversely there were numerous scenes where I wondered why Myers was in Cuba.

Scenes of Hemingway taking over conversations to up his ego by telling stories about himself may have been representative to the real Hemingway, however, when Mary started calling him on his self-centered behavior in public the film and acting didn’t engage me as being right or truthful. The general scenes of Cuba were OK, but I think there could have been more to share and Hemingway’s compound, although it may have been representative, was atypical of how Cuban’s live.

Richardson’s Mary Hemingway was uneven because the two different personalities she displayed didn’t seem to fit well. Ribisi’s character was strong and I didn’t buy that he was a writer because we didn’t get snippets of his craft, only praise by other characters. Minka Kelly as Myers’ girlfriend was very good and I enjoyed when she was on the screen. Sparks’ Hemingway was strong and I bought his character flaws and all. Shaun Toub as Hemingway’s long term friend Evan Shipman was very good. I loved his character as the supportive friend. Denne Bart Petitclerc wrote a screenplay that was erratically strong and challenged. Bob Yari’s direction felt uneven.

Overall:  This film was interesting in some ways and mostly to learn more about Hemingway’s later years.