All the Money in the World

First Hit: An interesting and slow moving detailed story giving light as to why it took so long get John Paul Getty III released.

I was curious about the 1973 kidnapping of John Paul Getty III (played by Charlie Plummer) when it happened. He was imprisoned by Italian mob kidnappers for almost 6 months before he was released.

At age 16 and part of the wealthiest family on earth at the time, the kidnappers thought this would be an easy way to extort $17M dollars from the Gettys. The kidnappers believed that because this amount of money was small pittance to J. Paul Getty (Christopher Plummer), the boy’s paternal grandparent, it would be an easy score.

However, as the film points out, J. Paul Getty had no intention to pay any amount for anyone in his family that was kidnapped for ransom. J. Paul believed that people were not reliable and that the only things that were reliable were physical things, like paintings, buildings, sculptures, and other such things. The man was a focused miser.

When the kidnappers contact John Paul’s mother Gail Harris, she said she had no money and couldn’t pay the ransom. Her former husband John Paul Getty II (Andrew Buchan) was a drug addled and addicted person. He was little and no use to either his former wife Gail or his father J. Paul.

Paul assigned Fletcher Chase (Mark Wahlberg) to find his grandson and help control Gail. However, the persistence of the kidnappers was extraordinary and only after sending Gail one of John Paul’s ears did J. Paul decide to assist a little.

The scenes inside J. Paul’s home was very reflective of his miserly ways. Lights were kept low and the coldness of the interior rooms was a perfect representation of the coldness in his heart and the disdain he had towards his family. The ultimate knife in the heart moment was when he finally agreed to spend some money to free his grandson, but he wanted full and complete custody of all Gail’s children and would only spend an amount that was tax deductible to free the boy.

The oppressive and obnoxious paparazzi were properly represented and displayed the low life jobs and intentions they make money from. The cold heartedness of the kidnappers and the obedience of their womenfolk was sad to witness. I kept wondering where was the compassion and the passion for which Italians are also noted?

Williams was strong in this role. Her intelligence and clear focus of what her priorities were was signified the difference between her and the family she married in to. Wonderful performance. Wahlberg was good as the man who wanted to serve both the man who paid him, J. Paul, and the needs of Gail. Christopher Plummer was fantastic. Although I occasionally wondered how the original actor, Kevin Spacey, would have done the part, Plummer’s physical presence, age, and acting abilities were sublime. Charlie Plummer was good as the privileged kidnapped grandson. Romain Duris as one of the abductors, Cinquanta, was excellent. He realized over time that he cared about John Paul’s welfare. David Scarpa wrote the script. The story and storyline was excellent but the execution by director Ridley Scott was un-inviting which made it difficult to care about the characters.

Overall:  This film was more interesting than engaging and I must commend Scott for the seamless way he replaced Spacey with Plummer in a month’s time.

Star Wars: The Last Jedi

First Hit:  Unimpressive effects, tired story, and there is little hope that the new cast of characters can carry this story into the future.

Trying to create the magic of the original film by using the same music, the open space background and the scrolling storyline explanation almost worked.

However shortly into the story, all we got to watch is multiple battles; signal combatants and groups of combatants. It just got boring to watch fight after fight after fight.

What would have helped was, if Rey (Daisy Ridley) had the depth of spirit and a powerful inner presence to play someone going to take us, and the story, to a next level and into the future. Her facial expressions showed she doesn't understand the depth of this story and the inability to create the kind of intrigue that Star Wars must hang on. The lack of communication through her eyes was a dead giveaway. This was a disappointment because in her first turn as Rey in “The Force Awakens,” she showed promise. The hopes of having a strong independent woman take us forward is perfect because Leia’s character passes with Carrie Fisher’s passing.

Another problem with this film is Luke Skywalker’s role and character (Mark Hamill). Here he is played as grumpy and tired. Yes, he has a right to be tired and grumpy, for all the battles’ he’s been through but the script gives him little room to breathe. Because of this he suffocates as Luke and so does the audience.

The story is essentially the turning over the final page of the old guard characters, and opening the book to the new guard. Hans Solo is gone, Darth Vader is gone, Snoke (Andy Serkis) gets toasted, and Leia, who is the leader of the resistance, has a son, Kyle Ren (Adam Driver), who becomes the leader of the first order bent on destroying the resistance and ruling the universe. Before it was father (dark) and son (light); now it is mother (light) and son (dark).

Too many things are already known, which is the opposite of what made the original film work. The first film was an exploration into the unknown. The films, after the original, varied in strengths and weaknesses, but always sought to keep an edge of the unknown for the future. The Force Awakens, was strong and was that way because it was a welcome back to the original story and characters and what would happen as they passed. Now we know - little.

Besides being overall dark of color, there are a few interesting special effects but nothing that will set this film apart from any of the other effects focused films that have come out in the last few years. Effects can never take the place of a good story with interesting characters.  And having mediocre effects and little story makes this film fail.

Hamill acted as though the life had been sucked out of him. Yes, this was part of the role but it didn’t seem like his heart was in this character any longer. Carrie Fisher as Leia was tired. She looked tired, there was little energy or enthusiasm coming from her and this swan song is not reflective of what she gave to the role in the past. Driver is one of the few highlights in the film as he does have the capability to carry the anger and darkness required as the new enemy of the resistance. Ridley is fair as Rey. She’s supposed to be a ray of light to the upcoming stories but to me she lacks a depth of spirit and it shows in every frame she’s in. John Boyega as Finn is good. As a side character and carrying what is good about the resistance he’s strong, but I didn’t buy into his being the fighter he is made out to be. Oscar Isaac as Poe Dameron was good but it’s mostly script and storytelling that fails him. Serkis as the character Snoke is good enough. Rian Johnson wrote this mediocre script that relies on fighting and digital effects more than telling a great story with characters. Johnson also directed this film and it shows that he doesn’t have the chops for telling a Star Wars story that intrigues an audience into the future.

Overall:  This film could keep me from seeing next installment as I don’t want to dragged down any further.

Downsizing

First Hit:  Slow, tedious, and, at times, funny and the only thing that made it worthwhile was Hong Chau as Ngoc Lan Tran.

Tran doesn’t appear until the last third of the film, but she changes the film and energetically makes the film interesting and better. Up until then the main character, Paul Safranek (Matt Damon), is generally depressed and lacks any energy.

Damon is too good an actor to phone it in, and therefore he must have been delivering what director and writer Alexander Payne wanted.

There is a point to the film and it’s about how humans are systematically destroying the planet. Norwegian scientist Dr. Jorgen Asbjornsen (Rolf Lassgard) wanting to find a way to slow down the destruction, comes up with making people smaller. In this case a normal 6’ person gets shrunk to about 5”. Asbjornsen figures it will allow humans to consume fewer resources and give us time to figure out how to save the planet.

The upside to downsizing, as it is called, is that your money is worth about one hundred times as much. This makes it worthwhile for people to downsize as they can afford to live a life of luxury. Paul and his wife Audrey (Kristen Wiig) are struggling financially and if they choose to downsize they can life a great life.

As Paul finds himself living a less than stellar life as a downsized person he has some regrets. When he meets, and spends a bit of time with his neighbor Dusan Mirkovic (Christoph Waltz) his life begins to change.

However, it really begins to change and the film begins to get interesting when Paul gets involved with helping Tran. Tran organized and led protests in Vietnam, survived prison time for her involvement, was downsized by the government, and escaped Vietnam inside flat screen shipping box. She became famous for this escape from Vietnam so Paul recognized her when he saw her.

Given her past, she works to help anyone who is struggling to survive in the downsized city they live in. Paul becomes inspired by her.

The visuals of the downsized world are excellent. The comedy comes from this and some of the interactions between the characters.

Damon was mediocre and I don’t know if this was a poor performance by him or by the script and direction. There were times I could sense and feel Damon trying to make the scene better but to no avail. Waltz was mediocre as well. He’s another reliable actor who can deliver and I’ve got to believe that script and direction failed him. Lassgard was OK as the discovering scientist and leader of the movement to downsize and survive. Wiig had a very small part in this film and her scenes seemed strained and pressed. Chau was priceless. It was worth the price of admission just to watch her perform in this film. She was spot-on sublime. Payne and Jim Taylor wrote the script which ended up being restrictive and pressed. Payne had no business directing this because the vision was too restrictive as the acting showed. He had great tools but it didn’t work.

Overall:  I had high hopes for this film and liked the characters, but it came up short, real short.

Rebels on Pointe

First Hit: A delightful and insightful film to the wonderfully joyful Les Ballet Trockadero de Monte Carlo dance company.

This film dives into this all male ballet dance company in a way that brings laughter, joy, sorrow and a deep human connection to the audience.

The dancers are an eclectic group from all over the world and their stories are similar: They didn’t fit well in their personal social situations and they love to dance. And dance they can. These men are extremely skillful dancers and by doing both the female and male roles of the ballets they dance, they bring an athleticism to the parts that are both different and wonderful.

To add to the engagement for themselves and the audiences, they augment their dances with a whimsical sassy comedic bent that is both physically and choreographically challenging.

This company has been together for more than forty years and it performs all over the world. Being gay, the dancers have struggled through the AIDS epidemic as well as enjoyed marriages between the dancers. This juxtaposition of how society has learned to embrace them is also visible by the number of children that come to see their performances. In the early years, parents did not bring their children because the gay dancers were not accepted by society, today lots of children come see them.

The film follows a few dancers more closely than others although my impression is that these dancers represented the group quite well. The current director use to dance with the company and his partner, also a dancer with the company, died from AIDS related causes. Additionally, the film follows them on tour to a few of the cities they regularly perform in and not surprisingly, they are a huge hit in Japan.

Bobbie Jo Hart wrote and directed this film with a lot of heart. The intimacy that is shared with the camera shows how well he embraced this subject.

Overall:  One of the most delightful and heart based films I’ve seen all year.

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle

First Hit:  The interaction of the actors in this film make it work – I enjoyed it.

It is hard to miss the funny mark when you’ve got Jack Black (as Bethany), Kevin Hart (as Fridge) and Dwayne Johnson (as Spencer) together in a film. The wonderful part is that Karen Gillan (as Martha) held her own quite well with these three funny and larger than life guys.

A young Spencer (Alex Wolf) is nerdy and unsure of himself. As the film begins, he’s being taken advantage of by a young Fridge (Ser’Darius Blain), who is a big strapping young man. Intimidating Spencer into doing his homework Fridge creates a friendship of convenience.Although Spence is somewhat resentful of being taken advantage of he does it anyway. After they get caught cheating, they are sent to detention.

Young Bethany (Madison Iseman) is the class popular beauty. She’s constantly on her phone and uses her contrived sexuality to get her way in school.  She ignores a teacher’s request to put away her phone and gets sent to detention.

Young Martha (Morgan Turner) is a nerd and introverted. She hates PE and tells the teacher she won’t participate in the exercise class and gets detention.

This is the setup and together in detention they discover an old electronic version of Jumanji. Getting sucked into the game they end up in a jungle where they arrive as the opposite of who they are outside the game. Spencer (Johnson) is no longer an intimidated skinny nerd, he’s a big, strong assertive man. The big man on campus football player Fridge (Hart), has turned into a small wise cracking man. The beautiful Bethany (Black) turns into a short dumpy man. And the nerdy quiet Martha (Gillan) has turned into a beautiful, strong woman who is a martial arts expert.

Given this setup, a lot could go wrong if the situations and dialogue are weak or don’t allow the actors breathing room, however this is not the situation. It works: The situations and dialogue create scenes that are funny and allow the actors to interpret both their former younger selves while embodying their new older bodies and skills.

Johnson is fun to watch here because his ability to seem like his size and strength are new to him really works. His interactions with Hart are priceless. Hart does a great job of trying to make the others still believe he’s still the size of his younger self instead of his shorter self. The script makes good use of his innate talents of making wise cracks and barking out his intentions. Black is perfect. He makes you believe that he was once a beautiful young lady who is now trapped in a stubby man’s body. I enjoyed the scenes when he gave Martha lessons on how to seduce the men guarding the transportation building. Gillan was fantastic because, despite her beauty, she embodied the nerdy girl of her younger self. She was great as the martial arts expert, ready to kick some butt. Wolff, Blain, Iseman and Turner all did a wonderful job of being the younger characters. Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers did a nice job of creating a screenplay that enhanced the story and actors. Jake Kasdan elevated the story to something fun and engaging.

Overall: I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed this film.